THURSDAY - SECTION A (27-OCT-22)

Pair 3 NS - Jan Argent / Ian Argent
Place: 3, Percentage: 52.86%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	5: Barry Blaney / Carmel Beddow	3NT W	9S	13	-520	4	33%
Board 2	5: Barry Blaney / Carmel Beddow	4 E	KS	10	-420	6	50%
Board 3	5: Barry Blaney / Carmel Beddow	4 W	6C	10	-620	11	92%
Board 4	5: Barry Blaney / Carmel Beddow	4 N	3S	10	620	8	67%
Board 5	5: Barry Blaney / Carmel Beddow	6NT E	QC	12	-990	4	33%
Board 6	4: Bill McRuvie / Jenny Wright	4 N	8C	9	-50	4	33%
Board 7	4: Bill McRuvie / Jenny Wright	3NT S	9D	12	690	10	83%
Board 8	4: Bill McRuvie / Jenny Wright	4 S	AD	5	-250	10	83%
Board 9	4: Bill McRuvie / Jenny Wright	2 N	AH	10	170	12	100%
Board 10	4: Bill McRuvie / Jenny Wright	4X E	KH	8	500	10	83%
Board 11	3: Peter Perry / Kym Jervois	4 N	KD	9	-50	2	17%
Board 12	3: Peter Perry / Kym Jervois	2 E	7H	9	-110	4	33%
Board 13	3: Peter Perry / Kym Jervois	4 E	8H	9	100	8	67%
Board 14	3: Peter Perry / Kym Jervois	5X N	KS	10	-100	0	0%
Board 15	3: Peter Perry / Kym Jervois	3NT S	6S	9	600	12	100%
Board 16	2: Carol Kemp / Peter Russell	5 S	4H	8	-150	6	50%
Board 17	2: Carol Kemp / Peter Russell	2 E	4H	8	-90	3	25%
Board 18	2: Carol Kemp / Peter Russell	4 W	KD	10	-420	8	67%
Board 19	2: Carol Kemp / Peter Russell	3 S	6H	10	130	5	42%
Board 20	2: Carol Kemp / Peter Russell	4 N	3S	10	620	5	42%
Board 21	1: Herschel Baker / Paul Kemp	3NT E	JS	9	-400	0	0%
Board 22	1: Herschel Baker / Paul Kemp	4 S	2C	8	-100	4	33%
Board 23	1: Herschel Baker / Paul Kemp	3 S	AS	10	130	12	100%
Board 24	1: Herschel Baker / Paul Kemp	4 S	4D	10	420	10	83%
Board 25	1: Herschel Baker / Paul Kemp	3 S	5H	8	-50	4	33%
Board 26	7: David Hallam / Jan Pengilley	3NT S	QS	9	600	3	25%
Board 27	7: David Hallam / Jan Pengilley	5 E	AS	11	-400	1	8%
Board 28	7: David Hallam / Jan Pengilley	1NT E	TD	8	-120	5	42%
Board 29	7: David Hallam / Jan Pengilley	6 N	AH	12	1370	12	100%
Board 30	7: David Hallam / Jan Pengilley	4 W	4C	10	-420	2	17%
Board 31	6: Barbara Jones / George Thomas	5 E	KS	9	100	11	92%
Board 32	6: Barbara Jones / George Thomas	2 E	6H	8	-110	5	42%
Board 33	6: Barbara Jones / George Thomas	2 W	4C	9	-140	4	33%
Board 34	6: Barbara Jones / George Thomas	3 S	3D	9	110	5	42%
Board 35	6: Barbara Jones / George Thomas	3NT S	3H	10	430	12	100%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results