MONDAY - SECTION A (10-JAN-22)

Pair 1 NS - Jenny Rosenfeld / Denise Whittaker
Place: 2, Percentage: 56.67%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	1: Elizabeth Smith / Ken Smith	6 S	3S	12	980	12	100%
Board 2	1: Elizabeth Smith / Ken Smith	2NT N	AC	8	120	6	50%
Board 3	1: Elizabeth Smith / Ken Smith	3 W	QC	7	200	11	92%
Board 4	1: Elizabeth Smith / Ken Smith	3 S	8S	10	130	10	83%
Board 5	1: Elizabeth Smith / Ken Smith	3 E	JH	9	-110	2	17%
Board 6	7: Neil Stenhouse / Peter Russell	2 E	3C	9	-110	9	75%
Board 7	7: Neil Stenhouse / Peter Russell	2 W	AH	9	-140	4	33%
Board 8	7: Neil Stenhouse / Peter Russell	3NT W	3S	5	200	12	100%
Board 9	7: Neil Stenhouse / Peter Russell	4 N	5H	9	-50	10	83%
Board 10	7: Neil Stenhouse / Peter Russell	1NT N	TD	11	210	2	17%
Board 11	6: Peter Perry / Clare Christiansen	3NT E	JC	11	-460	3	25%
Board 12	6: Peter Perry / Clare Christiansen	3 W	7D	9	-140	5	42%
Board 13	6: Peter Perry / Clare Christiansen	1 S	3C	7	80	3	25%
Board 14	6: Peter Perry / Clare Christiansen	2 E	TC	7	50	0	0%
Board 15	6: Peter Perry / Clare Christiansen	3NT S	7D	9	600	8	67%
Board 16	5: John Marsden / David Hallam	3NT E	4H	12	-690	1	8%
Board 17	5: John Marsden / David Hallam	4 N	QD	11	450	10	83%
Board 18	5: John Marsden / David Hallam	2 S	JH	9	110	9	75%
Board 19	5: John Marsden / David Hallam	2 E	6S	8	-110	2	17%
Board 20	5: John Marsden / David Hallam	3NT N	4D	12	690	8	67%
Board 21	4: Anne Siemon / Mary Thompson	1NT N	7H	7	90	9	75%
Board 22	4: Anne Siemon / Mary Thompson	4 N	7C	9	-50	7	58%
Board 23	4: Anne Siemon / Mary Thompson	1NT S	QH	7	90	9	75%
Board 24	4: Anne Siemon / Mary Thompson	2 W	AH	10	-130	5	42%
Board 25	4: Anne Siemon / Mary Thompson	5 N	2S	8	-150	10	83%
Board 26	3: Herschel Baker / Peter Stevens	1NT E	5H	6	100	3	25%
Board 27	3: Herschel Baker / Peter Stevens	3NT E	4D	8	50	10	83%
Board 28	3: Herschel Baker / Peter Stevens	4 E	JD	13	-510	4	33%
Board 29	3: Herschel Baker / Peter Stevens	4X N	9S	10	790	12	100%
Board 30	3: Herschel Baker / Peter Stevens	3 W	7H	11	-150	4	33%
Board 31	2: George Thomas / Bill McRuvie	4 S	5C	10	620	12	100%
Board 32	2: George Thomas / Bill McRuvie	3NT N	3C	11	460	8	67%
Board 33	2: George Thomas / Bill McRuvie	3NT S	2D	10	430	7	58%
Board 34	2: George Thomas / Bill McRuvie	3 N	2H	10	170	9	75%
Board 35	2: George Thomas / Bill McRuvie	4 S	AD	11	150	2	17%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results